IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/envlaw/v35y2023i3p445-454..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ClientEarth v Shell plc and the (Un)Suitability of UK Company Law and Litigation to Pursue Climate-Related Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Iglesias-Rodríguez

Abstract

In February 2023, ClientEarth filed a derivative claim in the High Court of England and Wales against the Board of Directors of Shell plc for alleged breaches of their duties under the Companies Act 2006. According to ClientEarth, Shell’s Board of Directors has failed to put in place an energy transition strategy consistent with the Paris Agreement, increasing the exposure of Shell plc to climate risks and hindering its long-term commercial viability. This analysis assesses the legal grounds of ClientEarth’s claim in light of the UK’s company law framework, and the High Court’s judgements of May and July 2023 dismissing ClientEarth’s application. It argues that, despite the lack of solid legal grounds for ClientEarth’s derivative claim, this case may serve to advance climate-related goals. More generally, the analysis reflects on how this dispute evidences the growing gap between the objectives of environmental law on the one side and those of company law on the other side.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Iglesias-Rodríguez, 2023. "ClientEarth v Shell plc and the (Un)Suitability of UK Company Law and Litigation to Pursue Climate-Related Goals," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(3), pages 445-454.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:35:y:2023:i:3:p:445-454.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jel/eqad029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:35:y:2023:i:3:p:445-454.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.