IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/envlaw/v34y2022i2p331-342..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying the Precautionary Principle to Emerging Zoonotic Disease: Lessons from China’s Response in Environmental Law

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Lan
  • Tianbao Qin

Abstract

Emerging zoonotic disease (EZD) is a major threat to human health which closely relates to anthropogenic environmental change. In its response to COVID-19, China applied the precautionary principle at the interface of environmental, animal and public health. As such, scientific uncertainties can no longer justify inaction against the causes of EZDs, and closer collaboration among sectors becomes an obligation under this integrated approach to precaution. Stricter regulation is established by improving the legal systems for surveillance, risk assessment and utilisation management. However, the aspiration for precaution is restrained, given that zoonotic risk indicators are still not explicitly incorporated into environmental impact assessment. By contrast, the prohibition on bushmeat consumption is so radical that it invites reflection on the limits on precaution. Taking social–political priorities and available enforcement resources into account, it is argued that the precautionary principle is flexible enough for countries to develop cost-effective regulation that adapts to context.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Lan & Tianbao Qin, 2022. "Applying the Precautionary Principle to Emerging Zoonotic Disease: Lessons from China’s Response in Environmental Law," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(2), pages 331-342.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:34:y:2022:i:2:p:331-342.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jel/eqab040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:34:y:2022:i:2:p:331-342.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.