IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v29y2026i1p69-86..html

Double machine learning for static panel models with fixed effects

Author

Listed:
  • Paul S Clarke
  • Annalivia Polselli

Abstract

SummaryRecent advances in causal inference have seen the development of methods that make use of the predictive power of machine learning algorithms. In this paper, we develop novel double machine learning procedures for panel data in which these algorithms are used to approximate high-dimensional and non-linear nuisance functions of the covariates. Our new procedures are extensions of the well-known correlated random effects, within-group, and first-difference estimators from linear to non-linear panel models, specifically, the partially linear regression model with fixed effects and unspecified non-linear confounding. Our simulation study assesses the performance of these procedures using different machine learning algorithms. We use our procedures to re-estimate the impact of the introduction of the National Minimum Wage on voting behaviour in the United Kingdom. From our results, we recommend the use of first-differencing because it imposes the fewest constraints on the distribution of the fixed effects, and an ensemble learning strategy to ensure optimum estimator accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul S Clarke & Annalivia Polselli, 2026. "Double machine learning for static panel models with fixed effects," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 29(1), pages 69-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:29:y:2026:i:1:p:69-86.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utaf011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:29:y:2026:i:1:p:69-86.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.