IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v28y2025i3p482-501..html

Robustify and tighten the Lee bounds: a sample selection model under stochastic monotonicity and symmetry assumptions

Author

Listed:
  • Yuta Okamoto

Abstract

SummaryIn the presence of sample selection, Lee’s (2009, Review of Economic Studies 76, 1071–102) non-parametric bounds are a popular tool for estimating a treatment effect. However, the Lee bounds rely on the monotonicity assumption, the empirical validity of which is sometimes unclear. Furthermore, the bounds are often regarded to be wide and less informative even under monotonicity. To address these issues, this study introduces a stochastic version of the monotonicity assumption alongside a non-parametric distributional shape constraint. The former enhances the robustness of the Lee bounds with respect to monotonicity, while the latter helps tighten these bounds. The obtained bounds do not rely on the exclusion restriction and can be root-n consistently estimable, making them practically viable. The potential usefulness of the proposed methods is illustrated by their application to experimental data from an after-school instruction programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuta Okamoto, 2025. "Robustify and tighten the Lee bounds: a sample selection model under stochastic monotonicity and symmetry assumptions," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 28(3), pages 482-501.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:28:y:2025:i:3:p:482-501.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utaf001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:28:y:2025:i:3:p:482-501.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.