IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v27y2024i1p37-61..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Augmented two-step estimating equations with nuisance functionals and complex survey data

Author

Listed:
  • Puying ZhaoYunnan
  • Changbao Wu

Abstract

SummaryStatistical inference in the presence of nuisance functionals with complex survey data is an important topic in social and economic studies. The Gini index, Lorenz curves, and quantile shares are among the commonly encountered examples. The nuisance functionals are usually handled by a plug-in nonparametric estimator and the main inferential procedure can be carried out through a two-step generalized empirical likelihood method. Unfortunately, the resulting inference is not efficient and the nonparametric version of the Wilks’ theorem breaks down even under simple random sampling. We propose an augmented estimating equations method with nuisance functionals and complex surveys. The second step augmented estimating functions obey the Neyman orthogonality condition and automatically handle the impact of the first step plug-in estimator, and the resulting estimator of the main parameters of interest is invariant to the first step method. More importantly, the generalized empirical likelihood-based Wilks’ theorem holds for the main parameters of interest under the design-based framework for commonly used survey designs, and the maximum generalized empirical likelihood estimators achieve the semiparametric efficiency bound. Performances of the proposed methods are demonstrated through simulation studies and an application using the dataset from the New York City Social Indicators Survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Puying ZhaoYunnan & Changbao Wu, 2024. "Augmented two-step estimating equations with nuisance functionals and complex survey data," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 27(1), pages 37-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:37-61.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utad014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:37-61.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.