IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v27y2024i1p107-125..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Penalized quasi-likelihood estimation and model selection with parameters on the boundary of the parameter space

Author

Listed:
  • Heino Bohn Nielsen
  • Anders Rahbek

Abstract

SummaryWe consider here penalized likelihood-based estimation and model selection applied to econometric time series models, which allow for nonnegativity (boundary) constraints on some or all of the parameters. We establish that joint model selection and estimation result in standard asymptotic Gaussian distributed estimators. The results contrast with nonpenalized estimation, which, as is well-known, leads to nonstandard asymptotic distributions that depend on the unknown number of parameters on the boundary of the parameter space. We apply our results to the rich class of autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (ARCH) models for time-varying volatility. For the ARCH models, simulations show that penalized estimation and model selection works surprisingly well, even for models with a large number of parameters. An empirical illustration for stock-market return data shows the ability of penalized estimation to select ARCH models that fit nicely the empirical autocorrelation function, and confirms the stylized fact of long-memory in such financial time series data.

Suggested Citation

  • Heino Bohn Nielsen & Anders Rahbek, 2024. "Penalized quasi-likelihood estimation and model selection with parameters on the boundary of the parameter space," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 27(1), pages 107-125.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:107-125.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utad022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:107-125.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.