IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v26y2023i2p147-173..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for quantile sample selection

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Corradi
  • Daniel Gutknecht

Abstract

SummaryThis paper provides distribution free tests for detecting sample selection in conditional quantile functions. The first test is an omitted predictor test with the propensity score as the omitted variable. In the case of rejection we cannot distinguish between rejection due to genuine selection or to misspecification. Thus, we suggest a second test using only individuals with propensity score close to one. The latter relies on an ‘identification at infinity’ argument, but accommodates cases of irregular identification, and neither of the two tests requires a continuous exclusion restriction. We apply our procedure to test for selection in log hourly wages using UK survey data and derive an extension of the tests to the conditional mean.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Corradi & Daniel Gutknecht, 2023. "Testing for quantile sample selection," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(2), pages 147-173.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:26:y:2023:i:2:p:147-173.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utac027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:26:y:2023:i:2:p:147-173.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.