IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v26y2023i1p25-44..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bubble testing under polynomial trends

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohu Wang
  • Jun Yu

Abstract

SummaryThis paper develops the asymptotic theory of the least squares estimator of the autoregressive (AR) coefficient in an AR(1) regression with intercept when data is generated from a polynomial trend model in different forms. It is shown that the commonly used right-tailed unit root tests tend to favour the explosive alternative. A new procedure, which implements the right-tailed unit root tests in an AR(2) regression, is proposed. It is shown that, when the data generating process has a polynomial trend, the test statistics based on the new procedure cannot find evidence of explosiveness. Whereas, when the data generating process is mildly explosive, the new procedure finds evidence of explosiveness. Hence, it enables robust bubble testing under polynomial trends. Empirical application of the proposed procedure using data from the US real estate market reveals some interesting findings. In particular, all the negative bubble episodes flagged by the traditional method are no longer regarded as bubbles by the new procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohu Wang & Jun Yu, 2023. "Bubble testing under polynomial trends," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(1), pages 25-44.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:26:y:2023:i:1:p:25-44.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utac020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:26:y:2023:i:1:p:25-44.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.