IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v25y2022i3p781-805..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Covid-19 lockdowns on social distancing in Turkey
[Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program]

Author

Listed:
  • Fırat Bilgel

Abstract

SummaryThis paper elucidates the causal effect of lockdowns on social distancing behaviour in Turkey by adopting an augmented synthetic control and a factor-augmented model approach for imputing counterfactuals. By constructing a synthetic control group that reproduces pre-lockdown trajectory of mobility of the treated provinces and that accommodates staggered adoption, the difference between the counterfactual and actual mobility of treated provinces is assessed in the post-lockdown period. The analysis shows that in the short run following the onset of lockdowns, outdoor mobility would have been about 17–53 percentage points higher on average in the absence of lockdowns, depending on social distancing measure. However, residential mobility would have been about 12 percentage points lower in the absence of lockdowns. The findings are corroborated using interactive fixed effects and matrix completion counterfactuals that accommodate staggered adoption and treatment reversals.

Suggested Citation

  • Fırat Bilgel, 2022. "Effects of Covid-19 lockdowns on social distancing in Turkey [Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(3), pages 781-805.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:25:y:2022:i:3:p:781-805.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utac016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:25:y:2022:i:3:p:781-805.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.