IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v25y2022i3p554-575..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation and inference on treatment effects under treatment-based sampling designs
[Instrumental variables estimates of the effect of subsidized training on the quantiles of trainee earnings]

Author

Listed:
  • Kyungchul Song
  • Zhengfei Yu

Abstract

SummaryCausal inference in a programme evaluation setting faces the problem of external validity when the treatment effect in the target population is different from the treatment effect identified from the population of which the sample is representative. This paper focuses on a situation where such discrepancy arises by a stratified sampling design based on the individual treatment status and other characteristics. In such settings, the design probability is known from the sampling design but the target population depends on the underlying population share vector, which is often unknown, and, except for special cases, the treatment effect parameters are not identified. In this paper we propose a method of constructing confidence sets that are valid for a given range of population shares. When a benchmark population share vector and a corresponding estimator of a treatment effect parameter are given, we develop a method to discover the scope of external validity with familywise error rate control. Finally, we derive an optimal sampling design that minimizes the semiparametric efficiency bound given a population share associated with a target population. We provide Monte Carlo simulation results and an empirical application to demonstrate the usefulness of our proposals.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyungchul Song & Zhengfei Yu, 2022. "Estimation and inference on treatment effects under treatment-based sampling designs [Instrumental variables estimates of the effect of subsidized training on the quantiles of trainee earnings]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(3), pages 554-575.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:25:y:2022:i:3:p:554-575.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utac008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:25:y:2022:i:3:p:554-575.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.