IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v25y2022i2p384-403..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing conditional moment restriction models using empirical likelihood
[Efficient estimation of models with conditional moment restrictions containing unknown functions]

Author

Listed:
  • Yves G Berger

Abstract

SummaryAn empirical likelihood test is proposed for parameters of models defined by conditional moment restrictions, such as models with nonlinear endogenous covariates, with and without heteroscedastic errors and non-separable transformation models. The number of empirical likelihood constraints is given by the size of the parameter, unlike alternative semi-parametric approaches. We show that the empirical likelihood ratio test is asymptotically pivotal, without explicit studentization. A simulation study shows that the observed size is close to the nominal level, unlike alternative empirical likelihood approaches. It also offers a major advantage over two-stage least-squares, because the relationship between endogenous and instrumental variables does not need to be known. An empirical likelihood model specification test is also proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yves G Berger, 2022. "Testing conditional moment restriction models using empirical likelihood [Efficient estimation of models with conditional moment restrictions containing unknown functions]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(2), pages 384-403.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:25:y:2022:i:2:p:384-403.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utab032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:25:y:2022:i:2:p:384-403.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.