IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v24y2021i3p482-501..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unifying inference for semiparametric regression

Author

Listed:
  • Shaoxin Hong
  • Jiancheng Jiang
  • Xuejun Jiang
  • Zhijie Xiao

Abstract

SummaryIn the literature, a discrepancy in the limiting distributions of least square estimators between the stationary and nonstationary cases exists in various regression models with different persistence level regressors. This hinders further statistical inference since one has to decide which distribution should be used next. In this paper, we develop a semiparametric partially linear regression model with stationary and nonstationary regressors to attenuate this difficulty, and propose a unifying inference procedure for the coefficients. To be specific, we propose a profile weighted estimation equation method that facilitates the unifying inference. The proposed method is applied to the predictive regressions of stock returns, and an empirical likelihood procedure is developed to test the predictability. It is shown that the Wilks theorem holds for the empirical likelihood ratio regardless of predictors being stationary or not, which provides a unifying method for constructing confidence regions of the coefficients of state variables. Simulations show that the proposed method works well and has favourable finite sample performance over some existing approaches. An empirical application examining the predictability of equity returns highlights the value of our methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaoxin Hong & Jiancheng Jiang & Xuejun Jiang & Zhijie Xiao, 2021. "Unifying inference for semiparametric regression," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 24(3), pages 482-501.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:24:y:2021:i:3:p:482-501.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utab005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:24:y:2021:i:3:p:482-501.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.