IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v22y2019i3p207-222..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A guided nonparametric goodness-of-fit test with application to income distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Kuangyu Wen
  • Ximing Wu

Abstract

SummaryWe have developed a customizable goodness-of-fit test of a parametric density based on its distance to a consistently estimated density. This consistent estimate is obtained via a nonparametric density estimator with a parametric start, wherein the start is set to be the hypothesized parametric density. To cope with the influence of nonparametric estimation bias, nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests have resorted to remedies such as undersmoothing or convolution of the hypothesized density. Our test requires no such devices and possesses enhanced powers against alternative densities because the guided density estimator is free of the typical nonparametric bias under the null hypothesis and attains bias reduction when the underlying density is in a broad nonparametric neighborhood of the hypothesized density. Here, we establish the statistical properties of our test and use Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate its finite sample performance. We use this test to examine the goodness-of-fit of normal mixtures to the distributions of log income of U.S. states. Although normality is rejected decisively, our results suggest that normal mixtures with two or three components suffice for all but one state.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuangyu Wen & Ximing Wu, 2019. "A guided nonparametric goodness-of-fit test with application to income distributions," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 22(3), pages 207-222.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:22:y:2019:i:3:p:207-222.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utz007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:22:y:2019:i:3:p:207-222.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.