IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ecpoli/v40y2025i124p931-967..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From ceasefire to cohesion: An integrated review of peacemaking and peacebuilding

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Hultman
  • Salma Mousa

Abstract

How can societies escape the conflict trap of violence and distrust between social outgroups? Existing research offers a plethora of tools for reducing conflict through peacemaking, peacebuilding, and reconstruction efforts. Peacemaking tools are often international efforts aimed at reducing violence in the short term by changing the immediate behavior of organized actors. Once violence has been stymied, additional peacebuilding efforts are necessary to foster intergroup trust, tolerance, and a shared national identity, thereby reducing incentives for violence and building resilience against future “shocks” to tolerance in the long term. Such efforts typically occur at the grassroots level, seeking to change the attitudes of individuals in post-conflict societies. We provide an overview of the evidence base on peacemaking and peacebuilding—identifying promising policies and programs, limitations, and shared mechanisms driving positive effects. We integrate these literatures into a framework tracing the path from immediate violence reduction to durable peace, pinpointing critical empirical and theoretical gaps in our knowledge of how to break the conflict trap.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Hultman & Salma Mousa, 2025. "From ceasefire to cohesion: An integrated review of peacemaking and peacebuilding," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 40(124), pages 931-967.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:40:y:2025:i:124:p:931-967.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/epolic/eiaf011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:40:y:2025:i:124:p:931-967.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebruuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.