IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v136y2026i673p61-96..html

Domino Secessions

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Lacroix
  • Kris James Mitchener
  • Kim Oosterlinck

Abstract

A secession movement is an uncertain process that evolves over time. We develop a simple theoretical framework in which regions use news to update their decisions to secede. Uncertainty and economies of scale are necessary conditions to observe ‘domino secessions’—sequential interdependent secessions. Empirically, we use geographically specific assets (state bonds) to assess how uncertainty and economies of scale influenced some slaveholding states’ decisions to secede from the United States in the 1860s. Uncertainty prevailed over the outcome of the secession movement with financial markets updating their priors on potential seceders at the election of Abraham Lincoln, but also every time a state seceded. We further document that financial markets priced in economies of scale to both state and federal debt.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Lacroix & Kris James Mitchener & Kim Oosterlinck, 2026. "Domino Secessions," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 136(673), pages 61-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:136:y:2026:i:673:p:61-96.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueaf035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:136:y:2026:i:673:p:61-96.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.