IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v135y2025i672p2531-2548..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition, Cooperation and Social Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Jeanne Hagenbach
  • Rachel Kranton

Abstract

Can competition or cooperation for economic gain affect people’s social perceptions of others? This paper experimentally examines this possible link from the economic to the social realm. Subjects engage in a task facing either a tournament or a cooperative pay scheme, after which subjects are asked their social perceptions of their counterparts in the task—how similar they are and how much they have in common. The pay schemes do not affect answers to the subjective similarity measure, but significantly influence subjects’ reports of commonality. Subjects who compete with counterparts for pay report fewer traits in common with their counterparts than do subjects facing the cooperative scheme. This treatment effect emerges even though our novel measure of commonality provides incentives to report accurately the number of common traits.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeanne Hagenbach & Rachel Kranton, 2025. "Competition, Cooperation and Social Perceptions," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(672), pages 2531-2548.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:672:p:2531-2548.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueaf032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:672:p:2531-2548.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.