IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v135y2025i670p1923-1941..html

Scared Straight or Scared to Death? Fatalism in Response to Disease Risks

Author

Listed:
  • Jason T Kerwin

Abstract

This paper shows that responses to disease risks can be ‘fatalistic’: higher risk beliefs can lead to more risk-taking rather than less. Intuitively, this can occur because high risk beliefs raise not only the chance of contracting the disease (which raises the marginal cost of risk-taking), but also the perceived chance that you are already infected (which lowers the marginal cost). I test for fatalism by randomly providing information about the true (low) average risk of HIV transmission in Malawi. Consistent with rational fatalism, the treatment causes sexual activity to rise slightly on average, but decline sharply for people with high initial risk beliefs—especially those with high baseline levels of sexual activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason T Kerwin, 2025. "Scared Straight or Scared to Death? Fatalism in Response to Disease Risks," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(670), pages 1923-1941.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:670:p:1923-1941.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueaf014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:670:p:1923-1941.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.