IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v135y2025i668p1261-1299..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Secessionism Mostly About Income or Identity? A Global Analysis of 3,153 Subnational Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Klaus Desmet
  • Ignacio Ortuño Ortín
  • Ömer Özak

Abstract

This paper analyses whether the propensity to secede by subnational regions responds mostly to differences in income per capita or to distinct ethnolinguistic identities. We explore this question in a quantitative political economy model where people’s willingness to finance a public good depends on their income and identity. Using high-resolution economic and linguistic data for the entire globe, we predict the propensity to secede of 3,153 subnational regions in 177 countries. We validate the model-based predictions with data on secessionist movements, state fragility, regional autonomy and conflict, as well as with an application to the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Counterfactual analysis shows that removing ethnolinguistic identity differences reduces the average support for secession from 10.1% to 0.2% of the population, while removing income differences has no major quantitative impact. Although both forces affect secessionism, identity trumps income in determining a region’s propensity to secede.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaus Desmet & Ignacio Ortuño Ortín & Ömer Özak, 2025. "Is Secessionism Mostly About Income or Identity? A Global Analysis of 3,153 Subnational Regions," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(668), pages 1261-1299.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:668:p:1261-1299.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueae110
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:668:p:1261-1299.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.