IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v135y2025i668p1167-1190..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distorted Technology Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Ayerst

Abstract

To what extent do firm-level institutional distortions drive cross-country technology differences? I develop a quantitative model of technology adoption in which heterogeneous firms adopt technology depending on their underlying productivity and institutional environment. The institutional environment is represented by size-dependent firm-level wedges on revenues that distort firm decisions. The model is calibrated to match the US firm employment distribution and the average adoption length of new technologies. In less developed countries, measured size-dependent distortions hinder highly productive firms, delaying the adoption of new technologies as these firms are (otherwise) early adopters. Measured differences in size-dependent distortions explain around half of the observed cross-country variation in adoption lags. Additionally, distorted technology adoption over doubles the aggregate productivity loss compared to static misallocation alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Ayerst, 2025. "Distorted Technology Adoption," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(668), pages 1167-1190.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:668:p:1167-1190.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueae106
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:668:p:1167-1190.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.