IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v135y2025i667p861-891..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Good Superstars: A Lab-in-the-Field Study of Wikipedia

Author

Listed:
  • Jérôme Hergueux
  • Yann Algan
  • Yochai Benkler
  • Mayo Fuster-Morell

Abstract

Many field public goods are provided by a small number of contributors: the ‘superstars’ of their respective communities. This paper focuses on Wikipedia, one of the largest online volunteering platforms. Over nine consecutive years, we study the relationship between social preferences—reciprocity, altruism and social image—and field cooperation. Wikipedia editors are quite prosocial on average, and superstars even more so. But while reciprocal and social image preferences strongly relate to contribution quantity among casual editors, only social image concerns continue to predict differences in contribution levels between superstars. In addition, we find that social image–driven editors—both casual and superstars—contribute lower-quality content on average. Evidence points to a perverse social incentive effect, as quantity is more readily observable than quality on Wikipedia.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérôme Hergueux & Yann Algan & Yochai Benkler & Mayo Fuster-Morell, 2025. "Public Good Superstars: A Lab-in-the-Field Study of Wikipedia," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(667), pages 861-891.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:667:p:861-891.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueae093
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:667:p:861-891.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.