IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v130y2020i631p2065-2104..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Terrorism on Individual Well-Being: Evidence from the Boston Marathon Bombing

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew E Clark
  • Orla Doyle
  • Elena Stancanelli

Abstract

A growing literature has concluded that terrorism affects the economy, yet less is known about its impact on individual welfare. This article estimates the impact of the 2013 Boston marathon bombing on well-being, exploiting representative daily data from the American Time Use Survey and Well-Being Supplement. Using a combined regression discontinuity and differences-in-differences design, with the 2012 Boston marathon as a counterfactual, we find an immediate reduction in well-being of a third of a standard deviation. In particular, happiness declined sharply and negative emotions rose significantly. While the effects do not persist beyond one week, they may entail adverse health and economic consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew E Clark & Orla Doyle & Elena Stancanelli, 2020. "The Impact of Terrorism on Individual Well-Being: Evidence from the Boston Marathon Bombing," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(631), pages 2065-2104.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:130:y:2020:i:631:p:2065-2104.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueaa053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:130:y:2020:i:631:p:2065-2104.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.