State Liquor Licensing, Implicit Contracting, and Dry/Wet Counties
Local option liquor laws are generally interpreted as granting vote rs the right to choose between allowing and prohibiting alcoholic bevera ge sales. This paper argues that the real choice confronting voters i s between legal sales according to state-prescribed rules and illegal sales according to an informal set of locally-determined rules. Give n this choice, rational voters will choose the option with the lower relative price. State laws restricting the number of licenses that can be issued in legally-wet jurisdictions prove to be more powerful than religious preferences in explaining the pattern of dry counties. Copyright 1988 by Oxford University Press.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 26 (1988)
Issue (Month): 3 (July)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK|
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://ei.oupjournals.org/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:26:y:1988:i:3:p:507-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.