IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v66y2026i1p205-223..html

Rabbits in Headlights: Professional Responses to Children’s Help-Seeking Practices When They Are Victims of Domestic abuse

Author

Listed:
  • Cait Jobson
  • Nikki Rutter
  • Josie Phillips

Abstract

The Victim and Prisoners Act 2024 has legislated the responsibility of professionals to respond when they are aware children and young people (CYP) are experiencing domestic abuse. However, CYP are often concerned about what adult responses to their help-seeking may be, frequently encountering adults who freeze, like rabbits in headlights, unclear on how to respond appropriately. Thus, CYP may engage in help-seeking at different levels, at different times, for different purposes. By aiming to improve CYP’s experiences of domestic abuse disclosures, this paper explores how creative resources can support and promote CYP’s help-seeking practices at three different levels: (1) facilitating open dialogue, (2) through the personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) curriculum, (3) holding space when disclosures occurred. We argue that policy and guidance contrast the experiences of CYP and professionals who highlight challenges during the pilot of these co-produced resources. Future work needs to explore how teachers and youth workers can engage in reflexive practice when exploring issues of harm with CYP.

Suggested Citation

  • Cait Jobson & Nikki Rutter & Josie Phillips, 2026. "Rabbits in Headlights: Professional Responses to Children’s Help-Seeking Practices When They Are Victims of Domestic abuse," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 66(1), pages 205-223.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:66:y:2026:i:1:p:205-223.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azaf029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:66:y:2026:i:1:p:205-223.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.