IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v65y2025i6p1369-1388..html

Neighbourhood Social Control and Police Legitimacy: An Empirical and Theoretical Exploration in the Context of Contemporary Urban China

Author

Listed:
  • Guangzhen Wu
  • Jianhong Liu

Abstract

Using data collected from a survey of 2,245 residents in a Chinese city, this study examined the influences of all three forms of social control processes (collective efficacy, semi-formal/public control and formal/public control) on police legitimacy. The results revealed a salient relationship between people’s assessment of these forms of neighbourhood social control and their police legitimacy judgements. This study also demonstrated a moderating role of perceived semi-public control, the most distinctive feature of social control in the Chinese social context, on the relationship between perceived public control and police legitimacy, further highlighting the importance of considering all potential forms of perceived neighbourhood social control to develop a theoretical understanding of perceptions of neighbourhood context and police legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangzhen Wu & Jianhong Liu, 2025. "Neighbourhood Social Control and Police Legitimacy: An Empirical and Theoretical Exploration in the Context of Contemporary Urban China," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 65(6), pages 1369-1388.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:6:p:1369-1388.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azaf016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:6:p:1369-1388.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.