IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v65y2025i6p1262-1279..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anchors Through Change: Exploring Identity Work in the Unified Probation Service for England & Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Gwen Robinson
  • Harry Annison
  • Lawrence Burke
  • Nicola Carr
  • Matthew Millings
  • Eleanor Surridge

Abstract

The Probation Service for England & Wales offers an important case study for those who are interested in the impact(s) of organizational change on workers in criminal justice and, in particular, the identity work that they engage in as they move through frequent iterations of change. In this article, we draw on data from an ongoing longitudinal study of probation reform to explore identity work among a mixed sample of practitioner and management grade staff in one of 12 probation regions. Our analysis reveals the significance of both occupational and organizational sources of identification to workers of all grades, but also evidence of dis-identification with aspects of the current organization. It further reveals the importance of anchors through change in workers’ identities as they navigate paths through successive reforms. These anchors include values, places and structures that are part of probation’s legacy but which offer a sense of continuity and meaning to workers as they adapt within a turbulent field.

Suggested Citation

  • Gwen Robinson & Harry Annison & Lawrence Burke & Nicola Carr & Matthew Millings & Eleanor Surridge, 2025. "Anchors Through Change: Exploring Identity Work in the Unified Probation Service for England & Wales," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 65(6), pages 1262-1279.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:6:p:1262-1279.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azaf007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:6:p:1262-1279.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.