IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v65y2025i6p1241-1261..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probation, Technical Compliance and the ‘Drowning’ of Hope

Author

Listed:
  • Jake Phillips
  • Adam Ali
  • Anita Dockley
  • Sarah Lewis
  • Kam Stevens
  • Stephen Farrall

Abstract

Hope and optimism are central to processes of reform. However, in the context of the dramatic restructuring and reorganizations that the probation service in England and Wales has undergone in the past decade, there are questions over the extent to which such hopes are realizable. We seek to explore the concept of hope in transforming individual’s lives away from engagement in crime. Via an analysis of interviews that were co-produced with people with experience of probation and undertaken with practitioners, those who have been supervised, and those on ‘the edge’ of the criminal justice system, we find that peoples’ hopes can be categorized as deep or institutional hopes. We argue that many probationers and staff members’ ‘deep’ hopes were ‘drowned’ by bureaucratic, managerial and risk-focussed cultures. There was evidence that probation staff wanted to instil a sense of hope in those that they supervise but that the current regime does not easily facilitate the creation and fulfilment of such hopes. We conclude by identifying ways in which probation could—given adequate resources and structures—become a more hopeful process for people under supervision.

Suggested Citation

  • Jake Phillips & Adam Ali & Anita Dockley & Sarah Lewis & Kam Stevens & Stephen Farrall, 2025. "Probation, Technical Compliance and the ‘Drowning’ of Hope," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 65(6), pages 1241-1261.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:6:p:1241-1261.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azaf006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:6:p:1241-1261.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.