IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v65y2025i6p1202-1220..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dialectics of Migration: Social Bulimia and the Deportation Pipeline in New York City

Author

Listed:
  • David C Brotherton
  • Sarah Tosh

Abstract

Following the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 New York City has undergone challenges to its status as a refuge to the teeming masses of the globe. Based on recent research in New York City, we trace the policing of its migrant communities as the US state has resorted to punitive measures to regulate non-citizens regarded as deportable aliens. While the city has resisted the exclusionary pressures of the security state, its criminalized black and migrant communities still produce the highest rates of removal, described as the deportation pipeline. We argue that the city, while presented as a model of immigrant integration, is a contested space caught between the forces of exclusion and inclusion and overdetermined by processes of crimmigration (Stumpf 2006). Such processes expand the criminological concept of ‘social bulimia’ (Young (1999a), a characteristic of late modern capitalistic society—examining how a broader dialectic between cultural assimilation and structural punitiveness is navigated by multilayered networks of contradicting actors, processes, and policies at the municipal level.

Suggested Citation

  • David C Brotherton & Sarah Tosh, 2025. "The Dialectics of Migration: Social Bulimia and the Deportation Pipeline in New York City," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 65(6), pages 1202-1220.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:6:p:1202-1220.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azaf010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:6:p:1202-1220.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.