IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v65y2025i3p639-657..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-imagining Procedural Justice in Policing Sexual Violence: Centring Survivors

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly Johnson
  • Rosa Walling-Wefelmeyer
  • Olivia Smith
  • Katrin Hohl
  • Oona Brooks-Hay

Abstract

Procedural justice is recognized as being of substantial value to policing and, increasingly, victim-survivors. However, little research has engaged with the meaning of procedural justice theory in sexual violence, and none have developed an understanding with and for survivors. We conducted consultations with 42 survivors via five diverse expert-by-experience panels in England. We propose the following new conceptualizations of the key principles of procedural justice: dignity and respect, equity and fairness, voice, safety and trustworthiness. These principles foreground a feminist, situated and intersectional approach, and emphasize the importance of recognition, equity and the unconditional humanity of survivors. This work offers a new understanding of procedural justice in the context of policing sexual violence, and in institutional responses to gender-based violence more broadly.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly Johnson & Rosa Walling-Wefelmeyer & Olivia Smith & Katrin Hohl & Oona Brooks-Hay, 2025. "Re-imagining Procedural Justice in Policing Sexual Violence: Centring Survivors," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 65(3), pages 639-657.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:3:p:639-657.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azae060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:3:p:639-657.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.