IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v65y2025i2p241-260..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racially Determined Case Characteristics: Exploring Disparities in the Use of Sentencing Factors in England and Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Eoin Guilfoyle
  • Jose Pina-Sánchez

Abstract

There is little understanding of how documented ethnic disparities in sentencing outcomes in England and Wales come to be and, consequently, how to address them. We argue that disparities in sentence outcomes could stem from how cases are constructed. We hypothesize that case characteristics determined through a high degree of judicial discretion and an assessment of the offender have a high risk of being racially determined, and therefore, operate as precursors of ethnic disparities in sentencing. We test this using Crown Court Sentencing Survey and Court Proceedings data. We identify three sentencing factors (remorse, good character and ability to rehabilitate) clearly favouring White offenders. We contextualize their operation and argue that all three should be classified as racially determined and sources of ethnic disparity. We conclude by setting out targeted policy solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Eoin Guilfoyle & Jose Pina-Sánchez, 2025. "Racially Determined Case Characteristics: Exploring Disparities in the Use of Sentencing Factors in England and Wales," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 65(2), pages 241-260.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:2:p:241-260.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azae039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:2:p:241-260.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.