IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/copoec/v39y2020i1p77-90..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

About Physiocracy: A Review Article Incorporating Some Remarks on An Important Letter of Galiani and on The Dissemination and Readership of Quesnay’s Works

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Sabbagh

Abstract

This paper is a review of a substantial collection of essays dealing with Physiocracy and its opponents. Its review led to the first correct reading of an important letter of Galiani and to some new clarifications on the readership of the works of François Quesnay.JEL Classification: B11; B31.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Sabbagh, 2020. "About Physiocracy: A Review Article Incorporating Some Remarks on An Important Letter of Galiani and on The Dissemination and Readership of Quesnay’s Works," Contributions to Political Economy, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 77-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:39:y:2020:i:1:p:77-90.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cpe/bzaa003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B11 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic)
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:39:y:2020:i:1:p:77-90.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.