Author
Abstract
The ratification of the revised European Stability Mechanism (ESM) Treaty remains blocked by Italy—a traditionally pro-risk-sharing Member State—preventing the entry into force of the common public backstop to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF). This undermines the EU’s crisis management capacity and nullifies the risk reduction efforts made by Member States and the banking sector over the past decade. As a result, the SRF operates without a mutualized fiscal safety net. While the fund is currently well capitalized through industry contributions and EU banks have shown resilience in recent stress tests, the lack of a public backstop limits its credibility and usability, especially in the event of a systemic crisis. No sound legal, economic, or operational rationale supports Italy’s refusal to ratify the Treaty. The alternative instrument (DBRI) is functionally unusable; the reform package strikes a reasonable balance between risk-sharing and risk-reduction; and the political stigma attached to the ESM cannot be resolved without modernizing its role. This article proposes two strategic pathways to overcome the deadlock: (i) recognising that the recently agreed Crisis Management and Deposit Insurance (CMDI) reform has materially improved the usability of the SRF and, by extension, the operational relevance of the common backstop—thereby strengthening the case for ratifying the ESM Treaty; and (ii) repositioning the ESM as a more strategic instrument within the EU’s policy toolkit, including through a potential role in supporting EU-wide defence investment and in providing guarantees for collective financial assistance to Ukraine. Unlocking the ESM Treaty ratification is not only critical to completing the Banking Union—it also opens the door to positioning the ESM as a more strategic instrument in Europe’s evolving policy mix. Recent progress on CMDI Insurance reforms makes ESM ratification more urgent, as continued inaction risks weakening the EU’s financial integration and its capacity to mobilize annual investments highlighted in the Draghi Report.
Suggested Citation
Judith Arnal, 2026.
"Beyond the deadlock: two pathways to revive the ESM and EU financial integration,"
Capital Markets Law Journal, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 1-024..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:cmljnl:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:kmaf024.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cmljnl:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:kmaf024.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cmlj .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.