IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cmljnl/v20y2025i3p7..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drawing the boundaries of ‘Naked’ short-selling by market-makers: the regulatory challenges of high-frequency trading

Author

Listed:
  • Vincenzo Bavoso
  • Michael Galanis

Abstract

The recent fine issued by the Italian securities regulator, CONSOB, against two Dutch hedge funds that had profited by shorting Saipem’s shares, provides an opportunity to reflect critically on two inter-related legal and regulatory questions. First, this case reveals an important and open problem in relation to the regulatory treatment and space of naked short-selling. Second, this article further delves into the potential application of the market-making exemption invoked by the Dutch hedge funds that critically operated as high-frequency traders. The function of market-making, particularly in the context of automated algorithmic trading, leads to further questioning the meaning and scope of this exemption.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincenzo Bavoso & Michael Galanis, 2025. "Drawing the boundaries of ‘Naked’ short-selling by market-makers: the regulatory challenges of high-frequency trading," Capital Markets Law Journal, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 1-7.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cmljnl:v:20:y:2025:i:3:p:7.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cmlj/kmaf007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cmljnl:v:20:y:2025:i:3:p:7.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cmlj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.