IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v7y2014i1p189-206..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban fiscal austerity, infrastructure provision and the struggle for regional transit in ‘Motor City’

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Hall
  • Andrew E. G. Jonas

Abstract

Studies suggest that urban fiscal crises trigger the institutional separation of strategic services from general purpose municipal functions. Traditional reformists have highlighted the economic benefits of regional approaches. Global austerity has created fiscal problems for central cities and suburbs alike, transforming the motives for regional solutions. This paper examines how the City of Detroit engineered a new regional arrangement with the surrounding suburbs to raise debt for the delivery of mass transit infrastructure. It represents a dual ‘spatial fix’ in the form of (i) a ‘state territorial fix’ providing fiscally stressed municipalities access to municipal bond markets and (ii) a ‘speculative spatial fix’ that benefits the Detroit growth coalition by linking regional mass transit to the prospect of land-use intensification.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Hall & Andrew E. G. Jonas, 2014. "Urban fiscal austerity, infrastructure provision and the struggle for regional transit in ‘Motor City’," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(1), pages 189-206.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:189-206.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rst031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Langley, 2018. "Frontier financialization: Urban infrastructure in the United Kingdom," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 172-184, June.
    2. Emily Rosenman & Samuel Walker, 2016. "Tearing down the city to save it? ‘Back-door regionalism’ and the demolition coalition in Cleveland, Ohio," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(2), pages 273-291, February.
    3. Dimitar Anguelov, 2023. "Financializing urban infrastructure? The speculative state-spaces of ‘public-public partnerships’ in Jakarta," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(2), pages 445-470, March.
    4. Andrew EG Jonas & Andrew R Goetz & Sylvia Brady, 2019. "The global infrastructure public-private partnership and the extra-territorial politics of collective provision: The case of regional rail transit in Denver, USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 1426-1447, May.
    5. Joshua Akers, 2015. "Emerging market city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(9), pages 1842-1858, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:189-206.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.