IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v19y2026i1p85-107..html

Regions, regulation and the “carriers of history”: how financial lock-in transformed the American South twice

Author

Listed:
  • David Bieri

Abstract

This article examines how financial institutions functioned as “carriers of history” in the American South’s economic development through two pivotal transformations. Using an evolutionary economic geography framework, I argue that distinct monetary-financial arrangements created path-dependent trajectories that reshaped the region’s economic landscape. In the antebellum period, state-level banking regulations, unit banking and agricultural credit systems produced a fragmented, undercapitalised financial system that became “locked in” through increasing returns and institutional complementarities. This initial configuration constrained industrial development and urbanisation, reinforcing the South’s peripheral economic status. The second transformation occurred during the post-Depression and post-WWII eras, driven by federal interventions, technological innovation and interstate banking. This shift created a new financial landscape characterised by increased capital availability and emerging regional financial centers — essential conditions for the South’s “economic revolution” in the latter 20th century. The analysis reveals how financial institutions can both constrain and enable regional economic transformation through path-dependent processes.

Suggested Citation

  • David Bieri, 2026. "Regions, regulation and the “carriers of history”: how financial lock-in transformed the American South twice," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(1), pages 85-107.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:19:y:2026:i:1:p:85-107.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsaf052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:19:y:2026:i:1:p:85-107.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.