IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v18y2025i2p403-418..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wind of change: shifting narratives on China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Duisburg and Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Johanna Fellbrich
  • Franziska Sielker
  • Nicholas Phelps
  • Peter Dannenberg

Abstract

Global networks of megaprojects like China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) face growing geopolitical challenges that shape their success or failure. This paper investigates how the BRI’s symbolic value has transitioned from economic hope to strategic concern, driven by evolving geoeconomic and geopolitical narratives. Focusing on Duisburg and Germany the study employs the frameworks of symbolic economy and symbolic policy to unravel the complex, multi-scalar interactions within these intertwined netscapes. The findings reveal that traditional success and failure metrics, typically centred on economic and operational outcomes, are insufficient. Instead, the study underscores the importance of symbolic factors (e.g. image creation, the alignment with broader political/economic agendas) in determining the long-term viability and perception of megaprojects in an evolving geopolitical landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanna Fellbrich & Franziska Sielker & Nicholas Phelps & Peter Dannenberg, 2025. "Wind of change: shifting narratives on China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Duisburg and Germany," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 18(2), pages 403-418.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:403-418.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsaf006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:403-418.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.