IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v50y2026i1p71-94..html

Exploring the association between economic democracy and income inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Cumbers
  • Robert McMaster
  • Susana Cabaço
  • Michael Vallely
  • Michael White

Abstract

In this paper, we contribute to ongoing debates about the relationship between economic democracy and inequality. We do this through three novel contributions to the literature. First, we develop an economic democracy index (EDI). Drawing on a range of theoretical approaches, our index broadens the conception of economic democracy beyond the traditional focus on the workplace and employment relations to the economy more broadly and at different scales, across a range of dimensions. Second, the EDI is then applied to OECD member states from 2000 to 2019 to produce a ranking. Third, we then use the index to investigate a potential association (correlation) between economic democracy and income inequality. Our findings suggest that Western European, especially Nordic countries have consistently higher levels of economic democracy than Anglo-American and Eastern European economies and that economies with greater levels of economic democracy have lower levels of income inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Cumbers & Robert McMaster & Susana Cabaço & Michael Vallely & Michael White, 2026. "Exploring the association between economic democracy and income inequality," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 50(1), pages 71-94.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:50:y:2026:i:1:p:71-94.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beaf053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:50:y:2026:i:1:p:71-94.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.