IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v49y2025i6p1271-1291..html

Was Carl Menger a process theorist? An assessment of his theory of wants and goods

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony M Endres
  • David A Harper

Abstract

We examine the widespread presumption that Carl Menger was a process theorist, with special reference to his theory of consumption. His theory is based upon postulates about wants and goods rather than utility. He builds a theory of consumption around the idea of a wants–goods nexus in which economizing agency, wants, combinatorial structures of goods-complementarity, volition, time, change, learning and discovery have important roles. We demonstrate that this theory also incorporates emergent patterns in consumption. A descriptive ontological assessment of Menger’s primary units of analysis—wants, goods and persons—reveals that at first, they present as static things or substances. When decomposed they also have processual modes of existence evident during different phases of consumption. Wants, goods and persons are intrinsically temporal and thus embody certain types of processes and a penumbra of related subprocesses occurring in social contexts: wants-recognition, goods-evaluation, exchange, life cycles and human development. There is a network of mutual interdependency between things and processes in the wants–goods nexus. By contrast with his neoclassical contemporaries, Menger deserves commendation for giving prominence to the processual nature of wants and goods.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony M Endres & David A Harper, 2025. "Was Carl Menger a process theorist? An assessment of his theory of wants and goods," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 49(6), pages 1271-1291.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:6:p:1271-1291.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beaf042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:6:p:1271-1291.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.