IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v49y2025i6p1255-1269..html

Economic analysis, history of economic thought and ontology: the case of Léon Walras

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Arena

Abstract

The aim of this contribution is to explore the nature and meaning of the relation between the history of economic thought (HET) and ontology, focusing specifically on the case of a prominent nineteenth-century economist: Léon Walras. Drawing on this illustrative case, it argues that the history of economic thought remains essential for a deeper understanding of current economic analysis. The interpretation of Walras’s economics proposed is different from the one which is often retained by most of the mainstream economists. It is not founded on individual rational choice but on four fundamental ontological indications which concern the definitions of society, economic agents and the state. This reinterpretation of Walras’s works gives a significant example of the importance of history of economic thought and ontology to better understand the meaning of economic analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Arena, 2025. "Economic analysis, history of economic thought and ontology: the case of Léon Walras," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 49(6), pages 1255-1269.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:6:p:1255-1269.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beaf050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:6:p:1255-1269.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.