IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v49y2025i6p1187-1213..html

Marx’s critiques of capitalism based on his practical ethics of freedom: an ontological reconstruction through the Hegelian theories of ethical life and social freedom

Author

Listed:
  • Doğa Öner

Abstract

I reconstruct Marx’s critical adaptation of the Hegelian theory of ethical life and social freedom to explore his ethical critiques of capitalism as a system of unfreedom. While freedom holds a central role in Marx, its meaning and role within historical materialism remain implicit. An ontological analysis of Marx’s inheritance of the theory of ethical life leads to conceptualizing his practical ethics consistent with the historical materialist social theory. Hegel’s socialized theory of freedom helps systematize Marx’s concept of freedom that contains emphases on individual realization, free labour, collective self-determination and stronger social bonds. This historical analysis illuminates Marx’s critiques of capitalism that overturn the Hegelian understanding of modern society as a system of social freedom that combines particularity and universality within relationships of reciprocal recognition. Marx shows that capital materially institutionalizes misrecognition of others, subjugates individuals as an untransparent and alien power, systematically constrains personal/negative freedom in accordance with its valorization requirements and turns it into a moment for reproducing a deeper system of unfreedom.

Suggested Citation

  • Doğa Öner, 2025. "Marx’s critiques of capitalism based on his practical ethics of freedom: an ontological reconstruction through the Hegelian theories of ethical life and social freedom," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 49(6), pages 1187-1213.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:6:p:1187-1213.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beaf049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:6:p:1187-1213.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.