IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v49y2025i6p1163-1185..html

From the invisible hand to the rabble: Smith, Hegel and social ontology

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Lazarus

Abstract

With growing wealth inequality today, early understandings of the capitalist market, whether justificatory or critical, are receiving greater attention in economic theorising. While G.W.F. Hegel is often considered an obscure metaphysician by economists, I argue his social ontology helps theorise the normative relationship between the market, labour and social freedom. Influenced by Adam Smith, Hegel thinks that civil society as a ‘system of needs’ is necessary for social freedom. However, it has unresolvable contradictions. The propensity for poverty and ‘moral degradation’ gives rise to a ‘rabble’—‘the worm in civil society’—which lacks recognition. I shed new light on longstanding issues in Hegel’s economic theorising by contending that his social ontology and construal of human labour differs from Smith and in effect challenges the ontological individualism of classical political economy and mainstream economics alike. Hegel’s idea of social freedom as mutual recognition gives insight to Marx’s value-form critique of capitalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Lazarus, 2025. "From the invisible hand to the rabble: Smith, Hegel and social ontology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 49(6), pages 1163-1185.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:6:p:1163-1185.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beaf046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:6:p:1163-1185.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.