IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v49y2025i5p955-975..html

Currency revolution and currency struggle: chartalist thought in modern China (1912–1949)

Author

Listed:
  • Zengping He

Abstract

Chartalism had once been an influential tradition of monetary thought in China. During 1912–1949, two currents of chartalism emerged in China: The thoughts of Sun Yat-sen and his followers on currency revolution and those of the Communist Party of China on currency struggle. Despite its historical significance, chartalism in modern China remains largely absent in English and Chinese literature. This study examines the historical context and theoretical content of chartalism in modern China and compares it with Western chartalism. The theoretical sources of modern Chinese chartalism include ancient Chinese chartalism and Western economics, which were introduced into modern China after 1840. During a historical period characterized by the loss of Chinese sovereignty, frequent wars and backward production, chartalists advocated for the issuance of state money to establish an independent sovereign currency system, address fiscal difficulties and develop the economy. Modern Chinese chartalism resulted from attempts to provide theoretical support for issuing state money. While modern Chinese chartalism has a theoretical core similar to Western chartalism—namely, that money is a creature of the state—it also has distinctive characteristics, most notably its emphasis on commodity reserves as a mechanism for creating demand for state money.

Suggested Citation

  • Zengping He, 2025. "Currency revolution and currency struggle: chartalist thought in modern China (1912–1949)," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 49(5), pages 955-975.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:5:p:955-975.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beaf034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:5:p:955-975.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.