IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v49y2025i5p1053-1072..html

Catalysts for equality: how unions and collective bargaining are shaping gender segregation in Chilean organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian M Ugarte
  • Angel Martin-Caballero
  • Robert Curiñanco

Abstract

This study explores the influence of industrial relations (IR) actors and institutions, particularly collective bargaining (CB) and unions, on gender segregation in Chilean organisations. Drawing on data from the Chilean Labour Survey (ENCLA) from 2011 to 2019, the research constructs three segregation indices using the ‘Duncan Dissimilarity Index’ to analyse disparities in wages, contracts and occupational levels. Generalised linear models reveal that firm-level CB is significantly associated with reduced gender pay and contractual segregation, while firm-level unions primarily influence contractual segregation, highlighting their relevance in promoting gender equity in contract types. However, neither unions nor CB impacts gender vertical occupational segregation, likely due to systemic constraints within Chile’s labour market. These insights offer a fresh perspective on how IR actors and institutions can act as catalysts for equality, crafting regulatory environments that promote gender equality at the organisational level, even within a neoliberal context where unions are limited to firm-level organising and bargaining.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian M Ugarte & Angel Martin-Caballero & Robert Curiñanco, 2025. "Catalysts for equality: how unions and collective bargaining are shaping gender segregation in Chilean organisations," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 49(5), pages 1053-1072.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:5:p:1053-1072.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beaf032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:5:p:1053-1072.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.