IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v49y2025i4p705-729..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

External imbalances and the balance of payments constraint: evidence on multi-sector Thirlwall’s Law for nine Eurozone countries (1992–2019)

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel García-Duch

Abstract

This article examines Thirlwall’s Law (TL) for a sample of nine Eurozone countries from 1992 to 2019. TL posits that a country’s long-run growth rate is determined by the ratio of its income elasticities of demand for exports and imports. Utilizing product-level data from the United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database (COMTRADE), this study categorises data into five main sectors based on technological intensity and estimates export and import equations for each sector and country relying on the autoregressive distributed lag framework and its error correction representation to compute short-run elasticities. The estimation techniques employed are seemingly unrelated regressions for exports and three-stage least squares for imports. Our findings reveal significant variations in income elasticities across sectors and countries, with a pronounced correlation between higher elasticities and more technologically advanced sectors, particularly among central economies. The article concludes that TL is a robust predictor of actual growth rates and a valuable framework for understanding the impact of external imbalances on the economic performance of the Eurozone over the past decades.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel García-Duch, 2025. "External imbalances and the balance of payments constraint: evidence on multi-sector Thirlwall’s Law for nine Eurozone countries (1992–2019)," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 49(4), pages 705-729.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:4:p:705-729.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beaf015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:4:p:705-729.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.