IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v49y2025i3p429-448..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marshall’s economic organon: the One in the Many and the Many in the One

Author

Listed:
  • Huan Wang
  • Liqun Du

Abstract

Marshall’s fragmented and incomplete account of his methodological perspectives has been a source of controversy. This paper argues that Marshall consistently employed a preliminary framework for economic methods, with the concept of the ‘organon’. This framework aligns with his view of economics as an engine for tracing the ‘reasoned history of man’, highlighting his integrative approach to economic inquiry. Marshall’s economic organon incorporated various constructive methods, such as analogical reasoning, organic evolution and historical analysis, reflecting the progress of the natural and social sciences. To reconcile divergent paradigms, Marshall resorted to the dialectical motto of ‘the One in the Many, the Many in the One’ as both a guiding principle and a strategic compromise. Furthermore, this paper asserts that Marshall’s economic organon extends beyond methodological perspectives to practical dimensions, as is in his academic activities and pedagogical practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Huan Wang & Liqun Du, 2025. "Marshall’s economic organon: the One in the Many and the Many in the One," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 49(3), pages 429-448.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:3:p:429-448.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beaf007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:3:p:429-448.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.