IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v49y2025i3p405-427..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relevance of Marshall’s thought today: from methodological eclecticism to his sociological outlook

Author

Listed:
  • Filippo Pietrini

Abstract

This article leverages the reinterpretations of Marshall emerged from the 1970s onwards to elucidate his philosophical vision, notably in relation to the application of models in economics and to his outlook on ethical progress. The literature showed how Marshall’s cognitive theory can be linked both to his method in studying market equilibria and to his view of social and industrial evolution (Dardi, 2016, 2019; Raffaelli et al., 1994b; Raffaelli, 2003). The focus of the present work is on the elements of his philosophical grounding discernible in both the logical connections mentioned above. The contribution to the literature consists of an interpretation of the lecture on American industry in Whitaker, (1975a) as an insight of a sociologist of knowledge ante litteram. Thus the paper broadens, with respect to Dardi, 2016, the field of Whewell’s influence on Alfred Marshall: from the methodology (Whewell’s idea of the dualistic nature of mathematics linked to the Cambridge mathematical intuitionism) to the causal relationship between industry and character and to Marshall’s keen eye for sociological facets. In many respects a contemporary Marshall comes to the fore, proving particularly valuable for those still grappling with epistemological issues in the social sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Filippo Pietrini, 2025. "The relevance of Marshall’s thought today: from methodological eclecticism to his sociological outlook," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 49(3), pages 405-427.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:3:p:405-427.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beae045
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:49:y:2025:i:3:p:405-427.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.