IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v47y2023i1p113-132..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monetary policy autonomy and foreign reserves accumulation in Brazil: a compensation view

Author

Listed:
  • Enzo Matono Gerioni
  • Lilian Nogueira Rolim
  • Julia Alencar
  • Nikolas Alexander van de Bilt

Abstract

During the 2000s, Brazil accumulated a substantial amount of foreign reserves through foreign exchange market interventions undertaken by its Central Bank. Mainstream economics considers such interventions a restriction to monetary policy autonomy. This article analyses the relationship between monetary policy autonomy and exchange rate regimes theoretically and empirically for the Brazilian economy. We argue that the compensation principle, as a direct derivation of the endogenous money approach, is an alternative to both the trilemma and dilemma views in the mainstream perspective. Then, we provide empirical evidence in favour of the compensation principle in the Brazilian economy by verifying the exogeneity of the interest rate and estimating a vector error-correction model (VECM) that indicates that the foreign reserves do not have a long-term effect on the monetary base, while they present a significant and large effect on the repos account. In line with the compensation view, we conclude that in the 2000s, Brazil had more monetary policy autonomy than conventional approaches would have suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Enzo Matono Gerioni & Lilian Nogueira Rolim & Julia Alencar & Nikolas Alexander van de Bilt, 2023. "Monetary policy autonomy and foreign reserves accumulation in Brazil: a compensation view," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 47(1), pages 113-132.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:47:y:2023:i:1:p:113-132.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beac035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:47:y:2023:i:1:p:113-132.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.