IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v46y2022i4p735-752..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exorbitant privilege and compulsory duty: the two faces of the financialised IMS

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Carneiro
  • Bruno De Conti

Abstract

Aiming at analysing the constraints to economic development, the article takes as reference the classic Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) approach to centre–periphery relations and seeks to update it from two points of view: adding the new historical context of the financialisation of capitalism and highlighting the new format and operation of the International Monetary System (IMS). The article’s objective is thus analysing the effects of financialisation on the IMS, emphasising the hierarchies of this system and its consequences for the economic dynamic of centre and peripheral countries. The main hypothesis is that financialisation has produced changes in cross-border capital flows, but also – and chiefly – in the ‘nature’ of the key-currency of the IMS. As a consequence, the exorbitant privilege of the reserve currency issuing country reaches a paroxysm, while peripheral countries are victims of a ‘compulsory duty’.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Carneiro & Bruno De Conti, 2022. "Exorbitant privilege and compulsory duty: the two faces of the financialised IMS," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(4), pages 735-752.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:46:y:2022:i:4:p:735-752.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beac027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Conti, Bruno & Breda, Diógenes & Welle, Arthur, 2023. "Capitalism in Brazil and COVID-19: crisis, repercussions and responses to the pandemic," IPE Working Papers 217/2023, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:46:y:2022:i:4:p:735-752.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.