IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v46y2022i3p609-612..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politicised revisionism: comment on Lopes (2021)

Author

Listed:
  • Per L Bylund
  • Christopher Lingle
  • Mark Packard

Abstract

We comment on a recent article by Lopes (2021), whose argument regarding the writing of the history of the socialist calculation debate is unfortunately burdened by a misconception of both the substance and nature of the argument that ignited the debate. Bringing additional sources from this time to scholars’ attention, we show that there is much more to the Austrian interpretation than standard interpretations of the debate admit. In fact, our findings indicate that Lange’s famous response to Mises’s challenge constitutes a rebuttal of a straw man.

Suggested Citation

  • Per L Bylund & Christopher Lingle & Mark Packard, 2022. "Politicised revisionism: comment on Lopes (2021)," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(3), pages 609-612.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:46:y:2022:i:3:p:609-612.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beac012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:46:y:2022:i:3:p:609-612.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.