IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v45y2021i6p1209-1226..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hayek’s twin ideas: reconciling methodological individualism and group selection
[‘Hayek Reads the Literature on the Emergence of Norms’]

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Schaefer

Abstract

Hayek repeatedly refers to ‘the twin ideas of evolution and spontaneous order’. Yet, critics argue that Hayek’s theory of cultural group selection is inconsistent with his theory of spontaneous order. To assess these criticisms, this paper situates Hayek’s social theory in the contemporary discussion surrounding multilevel selection. Hayek’s theory posits two main levels—rules and order—that exhibit upward and downward causation. An examination of Hayek’s theory of cultural group selection and his account of methodological individualism reveals that neither one can provide a fully adequate explanation of social phenomena. Neither individualistic nor group-selectionist analyses allow the theorist to fully account for social order, but taken together they provide a more complete explanation. Far from being substitutes, therefore, both types of analysis are complementary aspects of Hayek’s social theory. Understanding Hayek’s theory in this way allows us to glimpse how he might weigh in on contemporary debates surrounding multilevel selection in human societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Schaefer, 2021. "Hayek’s twin ideas: reconciling methodological individualism and group selection [‘Hayek Reads the Literature on the Emergence of Norms’]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 45(6), pages 1209-1226.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:45:y:2021:i:6:p:1209-1226.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beab036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Nientiedt, 2023. "Menger’s account of the origin of money as a case study in the evolution of institutions," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 205-215, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:45:y:2021:i:6:p:1209-1226.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.