IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v40y2016i3p913-939..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking the insights of Smith, Marx, Young and Hirschman on the division of labour: implications for economic integration and uneven development

Author

Listed:
  • P. Sai-wing Ho

Abstract

This article distinguishes between two types of division of labour discussed by Smith. The final-product-specialisation type has been adopted as the basis of mainstream trade models that champion the benefits of free trade. The division-of-production-operations type can be extended through the works of Marx (transition to modern industry based on forms of manufacture), Young (industrial differentiation) and Hirschman (linkages). Through this some countries started reaping more benefits from increasing returns, engendering incipient uneven development that aggravates under unrestricted economic integration between them and the trailing countries. In the modern era the leading countries’ trans-national corporations have further shaped the international division of production operations, resulting in different forms of enclave development when their activities are unregulated. Under recently reached multi-lateral agreements that limit the use of subsidies and investment measures and strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights, uneven development would be sustained. Some future research directions are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Sai-wing Ho, 2016. "Linking the insights of Smith, Marx, Young and Hirschman on the division of labour: implications for economic integration and uneven development," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(3), pages 913-939.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:40:y:2016:i:3:p:913-939.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bev012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher Cramer & Jonathan Di John & John Sender, 2022. "Classification and Roundabout Production in High‐value Agriculture: A Fresh Approach to Industrialization," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 495-524, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:40:y:2016:i:3:p:913-939.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.